"O que Lénin e Trotsky não atingiram com o fim de conduzir as forças que dormitam no bolchevismo para a vitória final, será obtido através da política mundial da Europa e América." - Rosenberg 1930

terça-feira, 3 de maio de 2011

mais um exemplo de absurda inquisição

Pub singer arrested for racism after Chinese passers-by hear him perform Kung Fu Fighting

Later that night, he was phoned at a Chinese restaurant and then arrested

A pub singer has been arrested on suspicion of racism for singing the classic chart hit Kung Fu Fighting.

The song, performed by Simon Ledger, 34, is said to have offended two Chinese people as they walked past the bar where he was singing.

The entertainer regularly performs the 1974 number one hit, originally by disco star Carl Douglas, at the Driftwood Beach Bar in Sandown, on the Isle of Wight.

ler mais em:

mais uma prova (se preciso fosse) da inquisição paranóica do politicamente correcto que já raia o absurdo e a parvoíce. e mais uma prova de que este Ocidente já não é livre e está seriamente doente...

13 comentários:

Anónimo disse...

The television set in your livingroom and bedroom is doing a lot more than just entertaining you.

Anónimo disse...

hinduismo na europa:

Slain Swede's husband wanted 'a way out'

Hugo Keith, a lawyer representing South African authorities, disclosed to Belmarsh Magistrate's Court that Shrien Dewani, 31, had previously told a witness he "needed a way out" of his marriage to Anni, his 28-year-old wife, a native of Mariestad in central Sweden.

"Dewani told (the unnamed witness) in April 2010 how he was engaged and had to get married," Keith said.

"He said although she was a nice, lovely girl who he liked, he could not break out of the engagement because he would be disowned by his family.

"He went on to say to the witness he needed to find a way out of it," added the lawyer.

Dewani was allowed to leave court early on medical grounds and returned to Fromeside Clinic, a secure mental health unit in Bristol, south west England, where he is being held on bail.

He was detained there last month after being kicked out of another hospital for disruptive and aggressive behaviour.

An expert on South Africa's prison system warned that if extradited, Dewani would be targeted by prisoners due to rumours about his sexuality.

"He's likely to be very vulnerable to sexual violence because of certain of his characteristics," Sasha Gear, from Johannesburg's Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, said by video link.

"The connections that have been made with homosexuality put him at additional risk," she added. "Inmates perceived to be gay are very vulnerable in prison and allegations of homosexuality ... put him at risk."


Anónimo disse...


Interview to The Daily Herald, London, by Gandhi
(March 16, 1921)

...Question: What do you think of the proposed revision of the Treaty of Sevres?

Gandhi: I have only hurriedly glanced through the new terms. So far as I can judge, they aim at pacifying Turks and not Indian Mussulmans. The two things have to be recognised as distinct. Khilafat is essentially a religious movement, being idealistic and unconnected with Turkish pacification. It derives its sanction directly from the injunction of the Prophet. Until, therefore, Indian Mussulmans are placated, there can be no peace, and the sine qua non of Mussulman conciliation is that what is termed the Island of Arabia must remain under the exclusive Mussulman control and under the spiritual sovereignty of the Khalifa, whoever he may be for the time being. The prestige of Islam demands rendition of Smyrna and Thrace to Turkey, and evacuation by the Allied Powers of Constantinople, but the existence of Islam demands the total abrogation of mandates taken by Britain and France.
No influence, direct or indirect, over the Holy Places of Islam will ever be tolerated by Indian Mussulmans. It follows, therefore, that even Palestine must be under Mussulman control.

Anónimo disse...


Inequity and degradation of women are sanctified in the Hindu religion. Manu Smriti says:

Never trust a woman. Never sit alone with a woman even if it may be your mother, she may tempt you. Do not sit alone with your daughter, she may tempt you. Do not sit alone with your sister, she may tempt you.

Again the same Manu Smriti continues:

“No liberty for women in society”.

Now, that is most disgusting!!! This sick pervert actually insinuates that one’s own mother will tempt him!

Anónimo disse...

Now see the verses of “Sacred” Hinduism Literature about women
Women = Dogs = Sudras = Untruth

“And whilst not coming into contact with Sûdras and remains of food; for this Gharma is he that shines yonder, and he is excellence, truth, and light; but woman, the Sûdra, the dog, and the black bird (the crow), are untruth: he should not look at these, lest he should mingle excellence and sin, light and darkness, truth and untruth.”

(Satapatha Brahmana 14:1:1:31)

Women are dumb !

“Indra himself hath said, The mind of woman brooks not discipline, her intellect hath little weight.”

(Rig Veda 8:33:17)

Women are powerless and have no inheritence !

“they could not discern the world of heaven, they saw this (cup) for the wives, they drew it; then indeed did they discern the world of heaven; in that (the cup) for the wives is drawn, (it serves) to reveal the world of heaven. Soma could not bear being drawn for women; making the ghee a bolt they beat it, they drew it when it had lost its power; therefore women are powerless, have no inheritance, and speak more humbly than even a bad man”

(Yajur Veda – Taittiriya Samhita 6:5:8:2)

A wife without a son is a discarded wife !

“And on the following day he goes to the house of a discarded (wife), and prepares a pap for Nirriti;–a discarded wife is one who has no son. He cooks the pap for Nirriti of black rice, after splitting the grains with his nails. He offers it with, ‘This, O Nirriti, is thy share: accept it graciously, hail!’ For a wife that is without a son, is possessed with Nirriti (destruction, calamity)“

(Satapatha Brahmana 5:3:1:13)

Women = Idiots = Animals = Untrustworthy

“At the time of consultation he should have removed idiots, the mute, blind, or deaf; animals and very old people; women, barbarians, and those who are ill or who lack a part of the body.”

“(Such) despicable (persons), likewise animals and especially women betray secret council; therefore he should be cautious among them.”

(Manusmrti 7:149-150)

Women are not fit for independence !

“Men must keep their women dependent day and night, and keep under their own control those who are attached to sensory objects. Her father guards her in childhood, her husband guards her in youth, and her sons guard her in old age. A woman is never fit for independence.“

(Manusmrti 9:2-4)

Hinduism is disgusting!

Anónimo disse...

The Hindu woman has no right to divorce her husband.
She has no property or inheritance rights.
Choice of partner is limited; moreover her horoscope must match that of the intending bridegroom/family.
The family of the girl has to offer an enormous dowry to the bridegroom/family.
If her husband dies she should commit Sati (being cremated with her dead husband). Since today’s law forbids Sati, society mainly punishes her in other “holy” ways (see below).
She can never remarry.
The widow is considered to be a curse and must not be seen in public. She cannot wear jewelry or colorful clothes. (She should not even take part in her children’s marriage!)
Child and infant marriage is encouraged.

Every day we read in the paper about dowry deaths, Hindu women being burnt by the husband or in-laws. It is a fact that upper caste Hindus ill-treat their women.

If the Hindu man’s wife dies, he is free to go and find another beautiful woman when he wants. But if the Hindu woman’s husband dies, not only is she prohibited to remarry but she should be cremated along with her dead husband (“Sati”). According to the Haria, the woman who follows her husband in death purifies three families – her father’s, her mother’s and her husband’s. These Brahmin theologians propagate the theory based in the Vedas that a woman who did not burn herself would never become free of being born as a woman again. If a woman’s husband was guilty of the murder of a Brahmin or guilty of “ingratitude” – then the wife who died clasping his body was said to purify him of his sins.

When His “Holiness” Puri Shankaracharya was asked about the fate of the widow’s children, he replied – “it is fate! Let the children suffer or die without a mother. But SATI has to be performed according to Hinduism”.

Anónimo disse...

The Times of India reported (14-9-87): Jaipur- In what appeared to be a revival of a centuries-old custom of “Sati”, a young woman belonging to a warrior caste of Rajasthan climbed into the funeral pyre of her husband, police said yesterday. Eighteen-year old Roop Kanwar’s husband, Mansingh, had died in a hospital in Kikar district on Friday, His body was later taken to his home village at Diwrala for cremation. Roop Kanwar sat on the funeral pyre while it was lit by one of Mansingh ‘ s relatives. Hundreds of villagers who knew of her “Sati” well in advance gathered at the spot shouting slogans in praise of the burning widow. Police, who claimed to have received the information late, registered a case against four close relatives of Mansingh for having “HELPED” Roop Kanwar commit “Sati”.

Roop Kanwar’s husband, Mansingh took more than Rs. 100,000 worth of dowry in the form of money, 25 tola of gold, a TV, a radio and a refrigerator. Though Mansingh had demanded dowry worth of 200,000 rupees, her father had success- fully negotiated and reduced the amount to Rs. 100,000/=. So far in the same village more than 23 dowry killings have occurred in the last 3 years as recompense for not bringing the promised dowry in time.

The paper continues that the most revealing statement came from Mr. Cheeta Singh, a village teacher who said:

“After all, she had no life to took forward to. As a widow, remarriage was out of the question in the Hindu tradition bound community”.

The teacher continues:

“The society treats a widow as a “kulachani” (an evil omen) and a economic liability. She has to remain barefoot, sleep on the floor and is not allowed to venture out of the house. She is slandered if seen talking to any male. It was better that she died, than live such a life,” he said.

Anónimo disse...

A report from REUTER (25-9-87): said that Roop Kanwar was forced onto the funeral pyre against her will and struggled to save her life. Some villagers alleged that Roop Kanwar was forced onto the pyre and that she cried piteously as she died. A police report established conclusively on 4-10-87 that Roop Kanwar did try to escape from the pyre before it was lit. But she was unable to do so as logs of wood were stacked up to her neck. Her screams, which the villagers insist was the recital of “Gayatri mantra,” were drowned in the slogans of “Sati mata kijai” (long live the lady of “Sati”). Although neighbours claimed that she was 18, the Times of India quoted school records as showing her date of birth as August 15th 1971.

A survey by a Calcutta Women’s Association reveals that most of the “Sati” are conducted because of the compulsion of the dead Hindu husbands close relatives, irrespective of the young widow’s protests to commit suicide. Though the Indian Law prohibits such a cruel act, never in Indian history have any of the dead Hindu husband’s close relatives been punished for forcing such crimes.

Had Roop Kunwar died in an accident instead of her husband, Mansingh would have sat as the groom in yet one more marriage ceremony with another beautiful girl. He would also pick up one more dowry worth 100,000 rupees and as a result Mansingh’s parents would have gained another colourful income.


Knowing that Kanwar’s father would not allow such a cruel murder, Mansingh’s parents had not even informed her father, he came to know of the incidents only through newspaper reports the next day.

Roop Kanwar’s father has lost his beautiful, young and only daughter in a cruel forceful murder in the name of Hinduism. Look at the atrocities to the Hindu women. BEING A HINDU WOMAN IS A CURSE.

Anónimo disse...

Dr. Lakshmi, a well known gynecologist and social worker from Delhi, and who herself is a Brahmin (and married to the age of 37), suggests that Brahmin women should come out of their shells and act their own since she claims that their corroded thoughts won’t save them at all.

Dr. Lakshmi again claims that most of the women who get married after 25 are not virgins. (Most Brahmin women do not get married until they are 30. For this long delay the Brahmin male is responsible for finally getting a SECOND HAND SPOUSE. She challenges that abstention from sexual activity is against the nature of the human physical body. She also says that it is the responsibility of the society to get them married quickly as in other religions.

She says that if you are a Hindu woman you cannot love anyone you like and you cannot marry anyone whom you choose. Your birth sign (stars) should match your mate’s birth sign. In addition you should meet the unbearable dowry demand.

Anónimo disse...

Em relação às elites políticas e económicas deveriam ser responsabilizadas pelo descalabro que tão sabiamente produziram.
Em relação aos que defenderam O Sr. Presidende da Républica quando era 1º ministro estudem bem esse período e vejam o que se produziu em Portugal:
abate de barcos de pesca, abate de oliveiras, o cartão laranja, o fim do salário máximo, privatizações, bolsa sem sem regras, dona branca, Pedro chaldeira, venda de toneladas de ouro do Banco de Portugal, grandes senhores de empresas de Portugal, o fim de um organismo que combatia a corrupção, o despedimento de um funcionário porque o mandou identificar, pagar para se inaugurarem obras públicas em tempo de campanhas eleitorais, Talvez tenha sido esse tempo o que Portugal recebeu mais de fundos europeus e o país conseguiu fazer o milagre de se individar.
Por vezes criam-se empresas mas o dinheiro sai do mesmo sítio(Estado).

Anónimo disse...

Peritos externos acreditam que para promover o arrendamento não basta criar incentivos ao mesmo, vai ser preciso cortar nos apoios à compra.

O Fundo Monetário Internacional (FMI) e a Comissão Europeia querem eliminar as deduções fiscais na compra de casa. A medida que está a ser ponderada pela ‘troika' vai ao encontro do que o Governo já previa na actualização do Programa de Estabilidade e Crescimento (PEC). E visa incentivar o mercado de arrendamento, num país onde 76% da população tem casa própria.

A ‘troika' que está em Portugal a analisar as contas do país considera que não faz sentido ser o Governo a incentivar a compra de casa. Nesse sentido, apurou o Diário Económico, Bruxelas e FMI vêem com bons olhos o fim das deduções fiscais, em sede de IRS, na compra de habitação própria.

A medida já tinha sido avançada pelo Executivo na actualização do PEC, em Março, cujo chumbo levou à demissão do primeiro-ministro. No entanto, o documento era um pouco ambíguo, não esclarecendo se o objectivo era eliminar ou apenas limitar as deduções. "Tendo em conta o elevado peso do crédito à habitação no total do crédito concedido a particulares (acima de 75%)", podia ler-se no documento "dever-se-á evitar a existência de incentivos que, no actual quadro de elevado nível de endividamento externo, possam promover o endividamento excessivo das famílias".

Nesse sentido, o PEC previa "uma redução dos benefícios e deduções fiscais que atingirão principalmente os indivíduos com rendimentos mais elevados e que abrangerão naturalmente aqueles associados ao crédito à habitação".

Anónimo disse...

Não admira que o FMI defenda o fim dos beneficios fiscais para quem comprar casa própria. Afinal não são eles os defensores do capitalismo? Ainda não ouvi dizer que apoiem um tecto salarial abaixo do Presidente da República, para o nosso país. Porque recebe o Governador do Banco de Portugal mais do que o seu homólogo nos Estados Unidos?

Anónimo disse...


Tom O'Neill of National Geographic reported that acid throwing is also used to enforce the caste system in modern India, where uppercaste individuals often attack Dalits for supposedly violating the order.