Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Anti-zog
Lista de blogues
-
Moral Philosophy? Baloney!Há 1 hora
-
The Divine RunesHá 3 dias
-
Month of the Leader, part 2Há 4 dias
-
Superação do passadoHá 2 semanas
-
How to Win at SlotsHá 3 semanas
-
-
Hello world!Há 4 meses
-
家庭教师是做什么的?Há 7 meses
-
Hello world!Há 1 ano
-
-
Learn to think like an SEO developerHá 4 anos
-
DELETION OF BLOG NOTICEHá 6 anos
-
-
SWEDEN WARZONEHá 7 anos
anti-euccp
anti-pc
anti-igualitarismo
anti-capitalismo e anti-marxismo
anti-parlamentarismo
23 comentários:
Os países árabes/islâmicos e seu lobby na ONU. Os árabes vivem a reclamar do lobby judaico, mas eles também fazem.
islam:
BBC News - Athens hit by second bomb blast in 24 hours
I personaly feel that the Muslim threat filling out countries with potentaly radical, and religious zealots wanting to kill every non-muslim the greatest threat. I am not attempting to deny the jew, but as I said...
"I personaly feel that the Muslim threat filling out countries with potentaly radical, and religious zealots wanting to kill every non-muslim the greatest threat. I am not attempting to deny the jew, but as I said..."
Neither am I attempting to deny the muslims or something like that.
jews and muslims are both crap.
"Not all Neo-Pagans are racially aware, let alone racially aware activists. The three largest Neo-Pagan groups in America - Asatru Alliance, The Troth, Asatru Folk Assembly - specifically reject Racialism and say they are anti-racist ideologies. Jews preempted racial ideologies, we can be sure that they have their own people or useful idiots at the helm of these "Pagan" groups, steering them away from racial nationalism and towards multiculturalism. Look at Emma Restall of the UK Druids... is she even White?"
enfim, nenhum odio contra o paganismo em si, mas os grupos pagãos não são de confiança.
encaro o paganismo nos dias que correm como uma brincadeira, embora com algum interesse cultural, de objecto de estudo e de revivalismo ancestral.
agora, o problema é que misturar religião com identidade da sempre merda e o resultado são essas aberraçoes desses grupos pagãos anti-racistas...
isto não é contra o paganismo em si. mil vezes "isso" do que qualquer monoteismo da Asia.
agora, perversoes decadentes...não.
Athens hit by second bomb blast in 24 hours
não foram esquerdistas?
Gas Field Confirmed Off Coast of Israel
JERUSALEM — Exploratory drilling off Israel’s northern coast this week has confirmed the existence of a major natural gas field — one of the world’s largest offshore gas finds of the past decade.
1
China, India, and the OIC Conspiring To Have International Governing Body Take Over The Internet?
The three specific issues considered above serve to illustrate that the Internet is at a critical stage of development during its shift from a primarily American-directed creation to a multilaterally regulated entity. The Arab League and OIC have determined technological development and the Internet itself to be high-priority areas of development, and it is likely that gaining influence and/or control over Internet infrastructure, including through ICANN, is part of the apparent OIC strategy, though it has been the Arab League that has so far taken concrete steps to gain recognition and power at ICANN.
To this point, continued American control of ICANN and its critical subsidiary, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA),[33] have largely directed the development of the Internet. However, there is considerable pressure on the United States to cede control over IANA to ICANN when the current contract between the Department of Commerce and IANA expires on September 20, 2011,[34] including pressure emanating from the European Union, as expressed at ICANN’s meeting in Brussels held this past June.[35]
Should the United States prove to be amenable to the E.U.’s suggestions and allow the contract with IANA to expire, it would lose considerable influence over ICANN, and the power structures governing Internet expansion and evolution would shift considerably – and not necessarily solely towards a European-dominated model.
2
The OIC has already effectively used the UN to push its censorship agenda. But the UN is virtually toothless when it comes to the United States. However if the Muslim world can dominate ICANN the way it dominates the UN General Assembly, then free speech on the internet is dead.
If this succeeds then 10 years from now, not only will sites like Jihad Watch or Religion of Peace lose their domain names, and most discussion of Islamic terrorism have to ‘go on the run’ in pop up social media groups that constantly get shut down (already the situation on sites such as Facebook) functioning like rats in the walls. But even the sites of mainstream politicians and newspapers will be targeted. Mandatory filtering by ISP’s. The removal of Israel’s Il domain, are all possibilities. And if anything I probably haven’t gone far enough.
The internet will become what the UN General Assembly is, a voice that speaks the Islamic narrative as one and bans any discussion or debate. Or marginalizes it so far that it never gets heard. Is this already underway? Yes.
On September 25, 2010, ICANN’s board of directors removed a reference to “terrorism” from the fourth version of its Draft Applicant Guidebook (DAG, or DAGv4), after complaints were received from several Arab individuals and organizations.
1) Until 2009, ICANN necessarily complied with applicable United States Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations regarding terrorism, and had no reason to specify such as the subject of a background check.
2) The term “terrorism” was included without any conceivably objectionable modifiers such as “Islamist.”
3) The Chairman of the (Pan Arab) Multilingual Internet Group Khaled Fattal declared that the term “terrorism” itself was objectionable because “it will be seen by millions of Muslims and Arabs as racist, prejudicial and profiling.” Fattal requested not only its removal, but an apology from ICANN.
3
The two-pronged approach of silencing dissent and unleashing terror is underway. This is why the internationalization of ICANN poses the gravest of threats not just to the thing we call freedom of speech on the internet, but to the entire global organization of knowledge and debate that has come to run through its networks. If ICANN goes IslamCANN then they will have captured the consensus.
This is a situation that few are talking about, even though in retrospect it may come to be one of the 5 issues that dramatically changes the world as we know it.
Meanwhile the UN is working along its own track.
The United Nations is considering whether to set up an inter-governmental working group to harmonise global efforts by policy makers to regulate the internet.
Establishment of such a group has the backing of several countries, spearheaded by Brazil.
At a meeting in New York on Wednesday, representatives from Brazil called for an international body made up of Government representatives that would attempt to create global standards for policing the internet – specifically in reaction to challenges such as WikiLeaks.
The Brazilian delegate stressed, however, that this should not be seen as a call for a “takeover” of the internet.
But that’s exactly what it is. A unified set of laws with regard to the internet is not about policing criminal activity. That is already policed under existing laws. It’s about criminalizing dissent.
Brazil’s left wing regime, which just decided to recognize Palestinian Arab terrorists as a state, tried to help Iranian dictator Ahmadinejad get nuclear fuel, is acting as a stalking horse for the takeover of the internet.
4
India, South Africa, China and Saudi Arabia appeared to favour a new possible over-arching inter-government body.
The appearance of China and Saudi Arabia on this list is not exactly shocking. China wants to tightly control all content that its citizens access. And Saudi Arabia representing the Muslim world wants to control the depiction of Islam worldwide. Between the Muslim world and China and left wing regimes like Brazil, there is a common agenda. Censorship. Control.
US politicians have responded to moves from within the United Nations to form an inter-Government panel to regulate the internet, putting forward a resolution demanding the UN maintain a “hands-off approach”.
California Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack has put forward a resolution that the United Nations and other international governmental organisations take their hands off the Internet.
Introducing House Resolution 1775 [see full text below], Mack argued that “the Internet has progressed and thrived precisely because it has not been subjected to the suffocating effect of a governmental organization’s heavy hand.
“The attempt of the United Nations to overtake something that is so central to our economy-like the Internet-is offensive and completely out of line,” she said.
“We have a hard enough time keeping the Federal Communications Commission’s hands off the Internet; imagine having to convince governments like Syria, Iran and Venezuela.”
A Republican congress is better position to oppose this, but the Obama Administration is committed to few things more seriously, than to weakening American power and collaborating with the ascension of the Muslim world.
The only real obstacle is likely to come from tech companies such as Google who benefit from open policies and don’t want to see the boot of dictatorships come down on them. Not just for ideological reasons, but for profit motives too.
Antecedentes
Em 1917, a Palestina abrigava, dentro de uma área de 26 mil km², uma população de um milhão de palestinos e 100 mil judeus e ainda se encontrava sob o domínio do Império Otomano. Com a derrota dos turcos na Primeira Guerra Mundial, a Palestina é colocada sob controle britânico, através de mandato recebido da Liga das Nações, em 1922.
Em 1921, os britânicos fizeram a partilha do território do Mandato separando quase 80% para a criação de uma entidade árabe, chamada Transjordânia (futura Jordânia). Os 20% restante, seriam destinados a criação de um futuro lar nacional para o povo judeu, conforme previsto na Declaração Balfour de 1917. [1]
1
The number of Muslims in Spain has climbed from 100,000 in 1990 to over 1.5 million in 2010.
Mosques are being constructed on a grand scale throughout the country.
The city of Barcelona, widely known as a European Mecca of anti-clerical postmodernism, has agreed to shell out nearly $30 million in public funds for the construction of an official mega-mosque with a capacity for thousands of Muslim worshipers.
The new structure in Barcelona will rival the massive Islamic Cultural Center in Madrid, currently the biggest mosque in Spain. An official in the office of the Mayor of Barcelona says the objective is to increase the visibility of Muslims in Spain, as well as to promote the “common values between Islam and Europe.”
In the past decade, more than 1,000 mosques and Islamic prayer centers have sprouted up throughout the once devoutly Catholic country.
Twelve new masjids are scheduled to open in northeastern Spain within the next three months.
The construction of new mosques comes at a time when municipalities linked to the Socialist Party have closed dozens of Christian churches across Spain by the enactment of new zoning laws.
The Barcelona mosque project was announced during a weeklong seminar titled “Muslims and European Values,” sponsored by the European Council of Moroccan Ulemas and the Union of Islamic Cultural Centers in Catalonia.
A representative of the Barcelona mayor’s office who attended the conference told the Madrid-based El País newspaper that the municipality would get involved in the mosque project because “although religion pertains to the private realm, this does not mean it does not have a public role.”
The idea to build a mega-mosque funded by Spanish taxpayers comes after Noureddine Ziani, a Barcelona-based Moroccan imam, said the construction of big mosques would be the best way to fight Islamic fundamentalism in Spain. “It is easier to disseminate fundamentalist ideas in small mosques set up in garages where only the members of the congregation attend, than in large mosques that are open to everyone, with prayer rooms, cafes and meeting areas,” Ziani told the Spanish news agency EFE.
Ziani also said European governments should pay for the training of imams, which would be “a useful formula to avoid radical positions.”
2
The Barcelona mosque is unique because it is a public project funded by Spanish taxpayers. Saudi Arabia built the “great mosques” in the Spanish cities of Madrid, Malaga, Marbella and Fuengirola, has been accused of using the mosques and Islamic cultural centers in Spain to promote the Wahhabi sect of Islam dominant in Saudi Arabia. Wahhabism rejects all non-Wahhabi Islam, any dialogue with other religions and any opening up to other cultures. By definition, Wahhabism also rejects the integration of Muslim immigrants into Spanish society.
Not surprisingly, the Saudi government officially supports the Alliance of Civilizations, an initiative sponsored by Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, which borrows heavily from the Dialogue of Civilizations concept promoted by Islamic radicals in Iran in the 1990s — an the initiative calls for the West to negotiate a truce with Islamic terrorists on terms set by the terrorists.
In December 2000, the Islamic Cultural Center in Madrid was expelled from the Spanish Federation of Islamic Religious Entities (FEERI) to “frustrate the attempts of Saudi Arabia to control Islam in Spain.” Most Muslim immigrants in Spain are from the Maghreb (especially Morocco and Algeria) or Pakistan; analysts say their low standards of living and low levels of education make them particularly susceptible to the Islamist propaganda promoted by Saudi Arabia.
Elsewhere in Spain, residents of the Basque city of Bilbao were recently surprised to find their mailboxes stuffed with flyers in Spanish and Arabic from the Islamic Community of Bilbao asking them for money to build a 650 square meter mosque costing $750,000. Their website for this Islamic community says: “We were expelled [from Spain] as Moriscos in 1609, really not that long ago. … The echo of Al-Andalus still resonates in all the valley of the Ebro [ie Spain]. We are back to stay, Insha’Allah [if Allah wills it].”
Al-Andalus was the Arabic name given to the parts of Spain ruled by Muslim conquerors from 711 and 1492. Many Muslims believe that the territories they lost during the Spanish Reconquista still belong to them, and that they have a right to return and establish their rule there – a belief based on the Islamic precept that territories once occupied by Muslims must forever remain under Muslim domination.
The Moriscos, descendants of the Muslim population that converted to Christianity under threat of exile in 1502, were ultimately expelled from Spain by King Philip III in 1609. Muslim leaders say Spain could right the wrong by offering Spanish citizenship to the Muslim descendants of the Moriscos as an “apology and acknowledgement of mistakes” made during the Spanish Inquisition.
3
In Córdoba, Muslims are demanding that the Spanish government allow them to worship in the main cathedral, which had been a mosque during the medieval Islamic kingdom of Al-Andalus and is now a World Heritage Site. Muslims hope to recreate the ancient city of Córdoba as a pilgrimage site for Muslims throughout Europe. Funds for the project to turn “Córdoba into the Mecca of the West” are being sought from the governments of the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, and Muslim organizations in Morocco and Egypt.
In Granada, a city in southern Spain that was the last Muslim stronghold of Al-Andalus to capitulate to the Roman Catholic kings in 1492, a muezzin now calls Muslims to prayer at the first mosque to be opened in the city since the Spanish Reconquista. The Great Mosque of Granada “is a symbol of a return to Islam among the Spanish people and among indigenous Europeans,” says Abdel Haqq Salaberria, a spokesman for the mosque. “It will act as a focal point for the Islamic revival in Europe,” he says. It was paid for by Libya, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.
In Lleida, a town in northeastern Spain where 29,000 Muslims make up 20% of the population, the local Islamic association Watani recently asked Moroccan King Mohammad VI for money to build a mosque in the center of town. Local Muslims are incensed that the municipality gave them land to build a mosque on the outskirts of town and not in the city center. Although the municipality gave the land more than three years ago, the local Muslim community has refused to apply for a formal license: it is demanding a more “dignified location for the Muslim community to worship.”
In Zaragoza, the fifth-largest city in Spain, the 22,000-strong Islamic community has been negotiating the purchase of an abandoned Roman Catholic grade school for €3 million. In September, however, a group of 200 teenage anarchist squatters took over the property (a seemingly normal occurrence in Spain), but a local judge has refused to remove them for “security” reasons. The local imam is now demanding a “big and visible location” for a mosque: many Muslims view the city as “theirs” and they want a way to show it.
Meanwhile, the Madrid-based ABC newspaper reports that more than 100 mosques in Spain have radical imams preaching to the faithful each Friday. The newspaper says some imams have established religious police that harass and attack those who do not comply with Islamic law. ABC also reports that during 2010, more than 10 Salafist conferences were held in Spain, compared to only one in 2008.
Salafism is a branch of revivalist Islam that calls for restoring past Muslim glory by re-establishing an Islamic empire across the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe. Salafists view Spain as a Muslim state that must be reconquered for Islam.
At the same time, Noureddine Ziani, the Moroccan imam, says it is absolutely necessary to accept Islamic values as European values. He also says that from now on, Europeans should replace the term “Judeo-Christian” with term “Islamo-Christian” when describing Western Civilization.
"só se for pra meter um trojan ainda maior dentro da iberia do que a merda que ja está..ninguem fala dos islamicos corrigirem isso ou aquilo das 200 milhões de vitimas da sua expansão ao longo desses seculos, mas quando se trata de explorar os valores aliens no oeste.."
280 milhões de vitimas
I would like to remind you that Germany is one of the most intellectual countries in the world. It has given to the world people like Kant, Hegel, Feuerbach, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Martin Heidegger -- great philosophers, great psychologists. And still a third-class crackpot, Adolf Hitler, managed to get all the intelligentsia of the country to follow him.
And I don't think humanity has learned anything out of it. If you don't learn, then history repeats. If you learn, then you can stop history repeating again.
Martin Heidegger was perhaps one of the most significant philosophers of the century, and he was a contemporary of Adolf Hitler. He supported Adolf Hitler -- inconceivable! The whole youth, which is the cream of the society, its intelligence, all the universities' vice-chancellors, professors -- they all supported Adolf Hitler, a man who was uneducated, a man who was refused from the school of art, who was refused from the school of architecture, because he had no intelligence.
This man became the leader of the most intelligent country in the world, and he created the greatest fascist regime. He killed almost ten million people, and still people were supporting him.
Martin Heidegger, one of the greatest intellectuals of this age, was a follower of Adolf Hitler. And after Adolf Hitler's defeat and the exposure of his basic animality, brutality, murderousness, violence, even Martin Heidegger shrank back and said, "I was simply following the leader of the nation."
If Adolf Hitler had been victorious, I am certain Martin Heidegger would have said, "He is victorious because he followed my philosophy." And certainly he was a great intellectual compared to Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler was just a retarded person.
Quem é Renato Seabra?
O modelo de 20 anos é o principal suspeito do assassínio de Carlos Castro
http://aeiou.caras.pt/quem-e-renato-seabra=f35010
"Organizações de defesa dos direitos humanos já responderam aos incidentes, acusando organizações nacionalistas russas de extrema-direita de estarem por detrás da situação. «Sem dúvida que a extrema-direita não desempenhou aí o último papel. Pelas declarações das organizações de fãs e pelas declarações de organizações de extrema-direita pode-se concluir que a extrema-direita desempenhou o principal papel na manifestação», disse Galina Kojevnikova, dirigente da organização SOVA, que luta contra a xenofobia."
li agora no fim da noticia que pensam que a ext direita participou. Mas como sabemos decerto essa ext direita nao ker perder terras
The Muslim Brotherhood was founded by Freemason Hassan Banna - and subsequent leaders were also Masons. The Brotherhood is a primarily Wahhabitic international umbrella organization for all sorts of radical Islamic movements.
EUA: Avolumam-se queixas contra juízes que enviavam jovens para a prisão en troca de dinheiro
Washington, 16 Fev (Lusa) - Queixas em nome colectivo acumulam-se contra os dois juízes norte-americanos que reconheceram ter enviado injustamente centenas de jovens para a prisão ou para centros de correcção, em troca de luvas de 2,6 milhões de dólares.
Uma organização de defesa dos jovens face à Justiça, o Centro Legislativo Juvenil, com sede em Filadélfia (Pensilvânia) vai entregar no final da semana as queixas de várias dezenas de famílias, depois de estas terem sabido que os seus filhos tinham sido enviados injustamente para a prisão, revelou hoje uma porta-voz.
Algumas famílias apresentaram já queixas-crime separadamente.
Os juízes da Pensilvânia Mark Ciavarella e Michael Cohahan reconheceram perante a justiça, na semana passada, ter "celebrado um acordo para garantir o fornecimento de jovens delinquentes" a uma sociedade privada de exploração de prisões, PA Child Care. Em troca, receberam compensações financeiras de 2,6 milhões de dólares de 2000 à 2007, segundo os documentos da Justiça.
São acusados de conspiração por fraude contra os Estados Unidos pelo Tribunal Federal da Pensilvânia.
No total, mais de 5.000 adolescentes foram declarados culpados durante este período pelos dois juízes pertencentes à comarca de Luzerne, uma antiga região mineira pobre de maioria branca. Mais de 2.000 foram enviados para a prisão, precisou Maria Roda, porta-voz daquele Centro.
Entre os testemunhos recebidos pela associação, figuram os de um rapaz enviado para a prisão para cumprir uma pena de nove meses por ter roubado um frasco de especiarias - noz moscada - no valor de quatro dólares.
Um outro jovem foi condenado a três meses de prisão por ter roubado uma verba insignificante de uma viatura e uma rapaz de 13 anos foi enviado para um centro de correcção vários fins-de-semana por ter explorado um edifício abandonado.
http://noticias.sapo.pt/lusa/artigo/9335736.html
Enviar um comentário